newLisp vs Perl executable

Notices and updates
Locked
tburton
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 3:02 am
Location: Oregon, USA

newLisp vs Perl executable

Post by tburton »

I wrote a Perl script a couple years ago that loops through all *.cfm files in a given directory, grabs the documentation from each, and writes that documentation to a text file. Using Perl2exe, the source was packaged into an exe of 347 KB.

I rewrote that script in newLisp and, using link.lsp, the source was packaged into an exe of only 174 KB.

About 50% smaller!

noah
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:02 pm

Post by noah »

How was the documentation included in the *.CFM files? Was it in the comments sections?

Lutz brought up the idea of embedding documentation in Javadoc-style comments in newLISP modules. He might be working on it, I don't know.

-Noah

noah
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:02 pm

About that newLISP executable

Post by noah »

Nice, tburton!

Not meaning to ignore your point.

-noah

tburton
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 3:02 am
Location: Oregon, USA

Post by tburton »

The documentation in the .cfm files is included within "home grown" comment sections.

Tim

Lutz
Posts: 5289
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 4:45 pm
Location: Pasadena, California
Contact:

Post by Lutz »

Yes I will do a simple newlispdoc system, similar to javadoc.

Lutz

Locked