For the Compleat Fan

m i c h a e l · Post by **m i c h a e l** » Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:23 am

Just noticed this section's description contains a spelling mistake. Those of you who can see which word it is, raise your hands. No, that's a stupid idea. I can't see any of your hands! Sorry, you can put 'em down :-)

m i c h a e l

cormullion · Post by **cormullion** » Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:19 am

(Forsooth I trust the young knave yclept 'm i c h a e l' jesteth and hath not mistaketh an archaic spellinge for the modern observance witnessed in these parliaments!)

It's cool that newLISP appears 4th in a Google search for "compleat fan" though ...

m i c h a e l · Post by **m i c h a e l** » Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:07 am

I know, let's change newLISP's name to yeOldeLISP!

m i c h a e l

Ryon · Post by **Ryon** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:46 am

Your noble Admin hath chosen the olde spellinge as suitinge his fancie. Havest thou a probleme withest that?

m i c h a e l · Post by **m i c h a e l** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:12 am

Feasceaft funden, he þæs frofre gebad.

m i c h a e l

newdep · Post by **newdep** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:21 pm

Ja en hier snap ik dus geen sikkepit meer van ;-)

m i c h a e l · Post by **m i c h a e l** » Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:28 pm

Norman wrote:Ja en hier snap ik dus geen sikkepit meer van ;-)

yes and here I get so no more bit of?

m i c h a e l