Benchmarking newLISP

Machine-specific discussion
Unix, Linux, OS X, OS/2, Windows, ..?
ralph.ronnquist
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:40 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Benchmarking newLISP

Post by ralph.ronnquist »

cormullion, please note that my test was run on a "1.5GHz A9 (ARM) dual core Android", with performance index 9.29 relative the Mac.... and not on that type Mac.

Also, the comparison across version might be somewhat fraught, but I still think it's interesting :-)

cormullion
Posts: 2038
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: latiitude 50N longitude 3W
Contact:

Re: Benchmarking newLISP

Post by cormullion »

Yes, that mistake has been made more than once... :)

ralph.ronnquist
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:40 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Benchmarking newLISP

Post by ralph.ronnquist »

If I may add some more correction: my newlisp proclaims being:
"newLISP v.10.6.3 32-bit on Linux IPv4/6 UTF-8, options: newlisp -h"
which possibly refers to the compilation host rather than runtime host.
The run-time host itself, via "uname -a" reports being:
"Linux localhost 3.10.33 #3 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 25 19:03:44 CST 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux"

I guess, in short, it's "newLISP v10.6.3-32-bit".

newdep
Posts: 2038
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 7:40 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Benchmarking newLISP

Post by newdep »

few years ltr... new hardware, same software ;-)

Code: Select all

/newlisp-10.7.5/qa-specific-tests$ ./qa-bench
254 non I/O functions performed SUCCESSFUL in 1.699 ms

Code: Select all

>>>>> Benchmarking all non I/O primitives ... (may take a while)
>>>>> total time: 956.0399999999998
>>>>> Performance ratio: 0.41 (1.0 on macOS 10.12, MacBook (Retina, 12-inch, Early 2016), newLISP v10.7.3-64-bit)
CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9700F CPU @ 3.00GHz
-- (define? (Cornflakes))

Post Reply