Benchmarking newLISP

Machine-specific discussion
Unix, Linux, OS X, OS/2, Windows, ..?

Re: Benchmarking newLISP

Postby ralph.ronnquist » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:29 pm

cormullion, please note that my test was run on a "1.5GHz A9 (ARM) dual core Android", with performance index 9.29 relative the Mac.... and not on that type Mac.

Also, the comparison across version might be somewhat fraught, but I still think it's interesting :-)
ralph.ronnquist
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:40 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Benchmarking newLISP

Postby cormullion » Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:21 am

Yes, that mistake has been made more than once... :)
cormullion
 
Posts: 2037
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: latiitude 50N longitude 3W

Re: Benchmarking newLISP

Postby ralph.ronnquist » Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:59 am

If I may add some more correction: my newlisp proclaims being:
"newLISP v.10.6.3 32-bit on Linux IPv4/6 UTF-8, options: newlisp -h"
which possibly refers to the compilation host rather than runtime host.
The run-time host itself, via "uname -a" reports being:
"Linux localhost 3.10.33 #3 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 25 19:03:44 CST 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux"

I guess, in short, it's "newLISP v10.6.3-32-bit".
ralph.ronnquist
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:40 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Previous

Return to newLISP and the O.S.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron