Impressive stuff. Too complex (for me) to say much about it without diving in and using it, which unfortunately would be slightly at odds with my current newlisp noosphere. Except, maybe, the random thought that with some huffing and puffing becomes the question of: why keep the state(s) of state machine(s) together with their process models? Or: who needs recursion?
Being a grumpy old engineer, I sound negative without even making an effort, and I probably should turn back to scanning #auspol tweets...
FOOP references [update 4]
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
FOOP references [update 4]
by hartrock » Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:24 pm
Last edited by hartrock on Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:44 am, edited 5 times in total.
- hartrock
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:37 pm
Re: FOOP references
by ralph.ronnquist » Tue Aug 18, 2015 11:33 am
- ralph.ronnquist
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:40 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: FOOP references
by hartrock » Tue Aug 18, 2015 11:35 pm
- hartrock
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:37 pm
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Anything else we might add?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest