(update) Looping
Posted: Fri May 12, 2006 6:34 am
First, sorry for being out of the loop (although I've been to the club every day), and I hope to fully rebound from the second point, which, since we're here, is Lutz's response to Unexpected. I really assumed he would reassure me of my assumption, but alas, this was not to be.
Since then, I've been looping through implementations of experminents, coming to grips with how contexts are actually implemented. I realized immediately after Lutz's response that the local symbols needed to live somewhere. I guess I expected that they only temporarily existed or something.
Now I'm beginning to appreciate the open nature of contexts. They seem like places instead of objects.
With time, it's sinking in. The danger, I suppose, is bringing too much of our hard-earned experience with prior languages to our understanding of the new one. Here, I thought contexts would act like objects, but that soon proved to not be true. Instead, when I approach a new language with an open mind and keep my assumptions in check, I sometimes find I have a natural affinity with the new language's way. I wonder if that is why children can learn things so quickly. I guess I just forgot that this time.
—m i c h a e l
P.S. In case it hasn't been clear, I admire Lutz's language very much :-)
Since then, I've been looping through implementations of experminents, coming to grips with how contexts are actually implemented. I realized immediately after Lutz's response that the local symbols needed to live somewhere. I guess I expected that they only temporarily existed or something.
Now I'm beginning to appreciate the open nature of contexts. They seem like places instead of objects.
With time, it's sinking in. The danger, I suppose, is bringing too much of our hard-earned experience with prior languages to our understanding of the new one. Here, I thought contexts would act like objects, but that soon proved to not be true. Instead, when I approach a new language with an open mind and keep my assumptions in check, I sometimes find I have a natural affinity with the new language's way. I wonder if that is why children can learn things so quickly. I guess I just forgot that this time.
—m i c h a e l
P.S. In case it hasn't been clear, I admire Lutz's language very much :-)