Search found 607 matches
- Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:26 pm
- Forum: Anything else we might add?
- Topic: On recursive procedures
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3042
On recursive procedures
If I load the contents of http://newlisp.org/index.cgi?roman_numbers_generator in newlisp, I can time it like this: > (time (roman 2006) 1000) 470 A version with less call overhead, but still recursive, will yield: (define (roman* n val rep vrlist acc) (if (not val) (roman* n ((*ROMAN* 0) 0) ((*ROMA...
- Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:12 am
- Forum: Anything else we might add?
- Topic: A Proposal for a new 'expr2xml' function
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4730
A Proposal for a new 'expr2xml' function
Recall the function 'expr2xml' from http://newlisp.org/index.cgi?page=S-expressions_to_XML : ;; translate s-expr to XML ;; (define (expr2xml expr level) (cond ((or (atom? expr) (quote? expr)) (print (dup " " level)) (println expr)) ((list? (first expr)) (expr2xml (first expr) (+ level 1)) (dolist (s...
- Wed Apr 26, 2006 5:12 am
- Forum: Anything else we might add?
- Topic: XSLT and newLisp
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7375
Lutz, thank you for your reply. You write that you're sure it can be done. Of course it can be done -- Lutz is always right. :-) Given a stylesheet 'person-style.xsl': <html xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xsl:version="1.0"> <body> <table> <xsl:for-each select="/persons/person"> <t...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:29 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Macros and deficiencies from CL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 16789
I guess this can't be too difficult to implement using macros in newlisp ? Care to give it a shot ? Do you mean implementing an "expanded 'dolist'"? Sure, I could create a 'dolist*' macro that you can '(return)' from, but am I allowed to implement it with 'catch/throw'? That is, do you object to an...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:14 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Article about newlisp vs. other lisps
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3264
Eli,
I put a response on c.l.l. at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lan ... 6b8ad21203
And, yes, I am childish. ;-)
I put a response on c.l.l. at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lan ... 6b8ad21203
And, yes, I am childish. ;-)
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:28 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Macros and deficiencies from CL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 16789
It just feels a little clunky to me that this 'catch' should wrap a loop to enable us to exit from it. Perhaps 'dolist' can be expanded by means of a macro to enable a more structured way to exit from a loop. I know. I felt the same way when I found out that 'return' in CL works by the fact that al...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:58 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Macros and deficiencies from CL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 16789
So, the common idiom in newlisp for returning (breaking) in the middle of the loop is by using the exception ? I like to think of 'catch/throw' as non-local exiting (i.e. I treat it in this more generic sense as a programming construct). Non-local exits can be used (are most often used?) for except...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:37 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Macros and deficiencies from CL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 16789
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:30 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Macros and deficiencies from CL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 16789
Yes, thank you Lutz! I will pick one bone though. Notice the following: (define-macro (lutz-and) (catch (dolist (i (args)) (if (not (eval i)) (throw nil) true)))) (define-macro (ricky-and) (catch (dolist (i (args)) (let ((res (eval i))) (if (not res) (throw nil) res))))) > (lutz-and (> 4 3) (println...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:47 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Macros and deficiencies from CL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 16789
Oops, we have to be careful. This version of 'my-and' is too eager: (define (my-and) (catch (dolist (i (args)) (if (not i) (throw nil) true)))) > (my-and (< 4 3) (println "hello")) hello nil > (and (< 4 3) (println "hello")) nil Here's one that is more lazy: (define-macro (my-and) (catch (dolist (i ...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:37 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Macros and deficiencies from CL
- Replies: 24
- Views: 16789
I don't know what is your particular motivation for using/trying newLISP. As for me, I like, if you'll pardon the expression, kickass scripting languages. :-) I use them from mundane scripting tasks to prototyping mainline applications. And in any of these cases, I want this language to be able stre...
- Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:19 pm
- Forum: newLISP and the O.S.
- Topic: Problem in opening newLisp script with a double-clic
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4521
I don't know, definitively, the answer to your question; however, I did notice a curious thing. The error message echoed the filename back as "C:\newlispDemo.lsp" and a backslash (really, pathname separator) is conspicuously missing. I don't know if this is a valid clue, but perhaps some newLISP vet...
- Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:47 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: newLISP mention on c.l.l.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2187
newLISP mention on c.l.l.
FYI, on this c.l.l. thread today/yesterday
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lan ... 23112559c/
Pascal Costanza mentions newLISP.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lan ... 23112559c/
Pascal Costanza mentions newLISP.
- Fri May 27, 2005 7:46 pm
- Forum: newLISP and the O.S.
- Topic: IRIX port discussion
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5766
Sorry Lutz, I have to leave the office soon. I won't be back until Monday which means that I cannot work on the port until then. While waiting for your verdict on `MAP_ANON', I substituted `MAP_SGI_ANYADDR' for `MAP_ANON' in `nl-filesys.c' and re-maded it. The make got through the `nl-filesys' compi...
- Fri May 27, 2005 5:08 pm
- Forum: newLISP and the O.S.
- Topic: IRIX port discussion
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5766
Thanks Lutz for willing to do this. Here they are (you might have to reduce the text size one notch in your browser to read this, due to the fixed width of the `code' box.): mmap(2) mmap(2) NAME mmap, mmap64 - map pages of memory SYNOPSIS #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/mman.h> void *mmap(void ...
- Fri May 27, 2005 2:23 pm
- Forum: newLISP and the O.S.
- Topic: IRIX port discussion
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5766
IRIX port discussion
OK. Taking a leaf from Peter's book, I open this discussion in the "Lisp in general" forum. OK, first problem. I tried a `make solaris' and, lo and behold, the call to `mmap()' in `nl-filesys.c' fails because IRIX doesn't have a `MAP_ANON' flag in its `<sys/mman.h>'. A `man mmap' says that these are...
- Fri May 27, 2005 2:26 am
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: development version newLISP v.8.5.9
- Replies: 36
- Views: 20920
- Thu May 26, 2005 8:33 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: development version newLISP v.8.5.9
- Replies: 36
- Views: 20920
Cygwin -- no respect ;-)
Hey Lutz, Sorry to see you dropped cygwin support. I was one of the (few?) cygwin users. Say, has anyone approached you about supporting/porting to SGI IRIX 6.5 (mips, n32)? We have several here at work on which I'd love to run newlisp. I really don't know where to start; however, if (1) you don't h...
- Tue May 03, 2005 5:05 am
- Forum: Anything else we might add?
- Topic: Splitting Numbers into component parts
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1934
Here's a lame way to do it: (define (re-remove re str) (replace re str "" 0)) (define (split-number-at-point n) (let ((n-split (parse (format "%f" (float n)) ".")) (sign (if (< n 0) -1 1))) (list sign (re-remove "^0+" (re-remove "^-" (n-split 0))) (re-remove "0+$" (n-split 1))))) (define (extract-di...
- Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:52 pm
- Forum: newLISP in the real world
- Topic: Unicode and newLISP-tk
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3126
Awesome! You know what would be cool too? If one could do this in newLISP:
That is, make λ the same as lambda. Now that would rock. --Ricky
P.S. -- What is "ñañañá"? It's sounds like something a baby would say. :-)
Code: Select all
> (map (λ (x) (+ x 42)) '(1 2 3))
(43 44 45)
P.S. -- What is "ñañañá"? It's sounds like something a baby would say. :-)
- Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:04 pm
- Forum: Anything else we might add?
- Topic: 99 Smiley's ahead :)
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9980
Very cool, Norman! If I use that but remove the 'append' call, I get the same thing. Thanks for making these submissions -- although it seems a time-waster, you've actually been teaching me some points of newLISP programming! For instance, I never really paid attention much to string slicing until r...
- Tue Apr 26, 2005 4:18 pm
- Forum: Anything else we might add?
- Topic: 99 Smiley's ahead :)
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9980
- Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:33 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: kozoru.com giving a boost to newLISP
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4586
Which is much, much better than what the Kogut guy says, namely:
--Ricky
Code: Select all
(apply pack(let((x(dup"c"3)))(cons x(let((x(unpack x":-)")))(set-nth 2x(-(x 2)1))))))
- Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:14 am
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: Makefile change: uninstall target
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2931
- Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:33 pm
- Forum: newLISP newS
- Topic: newLISP now on Graham's list
- Replies: 55
- Views: 49361
Lutz, I completely understand your exasperation with the Qrczak postings. His motivations do not seem genuinely constructive, but more along the lines of having an axe to grind (or maybe an axe to swing in this case). A read of the Kogut FAQ ( http://kokogut.sourceforge.net/faq.html ) may reveal som...