Search found 3 matches
- Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:03 am
- Forum: newLISP in the real world
- Topic: 3 questions regarding modularizing code
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4456
Re: 3 questions regarding modularizing code
Thank you very much for sharing, I'll check it out. Up to now my impression is that the approach of xml to name-spaces is provably the most effective one: Using a URL to define a unique global name-space and a symbol that references it as a prefix to cut down on the verbosity. e.g.: in the module fi...
- Thu Jul 01, 2010 2:39 am
- Forum: newLISP in the real world
- Topic: 3 questions regarding modularizing code
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4456
Re: 3 questions regarding modularizing code
Thank you very much for your answers, I'll go through the links, but above all thank you for releasing newLISP. I haven't been so impressed with a language since I found FORTH. It's refreshing to see a language embracing dynamism to this extent while remaining compact and approachable. After being d...
- Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:39 pm
- Forum: newLISP in the real world
- Topic: 3 questions regarding modularizing code
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4456
3 questions regarding modularizing code
Hello, new user here. After browsing the documentation and the forum I still have some doubts regarding the best approach to modularization/isolation of code in order to prevent name clashes or unintended overwrites. Are the 16 slots for C callbacks global or per shared object? e.g.: If I load two i...