Search found 5 matches

by bubba88
Thu Dec 04, 2008 8:10 pm
Forum: Anything else we might add?
Topic: newLISP-Machine hardware implementation
Replies: 10
Views: 10549

Thanks, everyone:)

I will report you as soon, as I achieve something worthy to discuss.
by bubba88
Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:40 pm
Forum: Anything else we might add?
Topic: newLISP-Machine hardware implementation
Replies: 10
Views: 10549

Re: Ok

And it's true, newLISP is not 100% compliant with the LISP standard... But it tries to better LISP by simplifying and focusing on what you want to use LISP for... LIS t P rocessing... CONS in Common Lisp is more low level... You can create a cell that represents almost anything... In newLISP you ca...
by bubba88
Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:26 pm
Forum: Anything else we might add?
Topic: newLISP-Machine hardware implementation
Replies: 10
Views: 10549

cormullion wrote:Do you have to write a compiler first? Or does the machine just 'know' the language...?
I think it would be better to do it as "hardware" as possible, so i think - yes - the machine should just know the language. But a variant with some intermediate language is appropriate, too.
by bubba88
Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:02 pm
Forum: Anything else we might add?
Topic: newLISP-Machine hardware implementation
Replies: 10
Views: 10549

Ok

Actually, I thoght about creating something like VHDL template for such machines in FGPA.
Is that a bad idea too?
by bubba88
Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:57 pm
Forum: Anything else we might add?
Topic: newLISP-Machine hardware implementation
Replies: 10
Views: 10549

newLISP-Machine hardware implementation

Hello.

If anyone has an idea about the subj - please, post it here.