newlispfanclub.alh.net

Also in abstraction level, newLisp is a crack. So, fitted to a fast database engine, with good pattern-matching and language manipulating functions, its got to be... Data mining ? No, data exploding !
end do.

So thats all ! simple So I may assume theres no need for setf either. Everything can be either 'set' or 'replaced'. In the edit window, it would be phantastic to be able to evaluate a single expression, by 'dragging' it (the same you do with cut&paste), or placing the cursor just after it... but I s...

Hi I'm new to the forum, so bear with me.... I think this a wonderful lisp interpreter. True to the original lisp spirits. I miss the useful copy-list function, especially since there are quite a few 'destructive' functions, for instance sort, that often must rely on previous copying of original lis...

I like subseq as a substring/sublist substitute. Severals reasons: -Its already in Common Lisp, it reminds you better about what it does. it reminds also where does it come from, i.e. substring/sublist Functions' names should be 'selfexplanatory', as far as possible. As for setq, I agree it has been...