Very well, this is not a bug.
I made two mistakes:
1) I didn't properly read intersect documentation so I expected it to do something a bit different.
2) I didn't realize that the algebraic intersection doesn't really make sense on lists with the same element more times.
I'm sorry guys.
Search found 3 matches
- Tue Mar 04, 2014 5:30 pm
- Forum: newLISP in the real world
- Topic: Intersect bug
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6253
- Tue Mar 04, 2014 10:47 am
- Forum: newLISP in the real world
- Topic: Intersect bug
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6253
Re: Intersect bug
Now that I read intersect documentation again it looks like this behavior is correct. In the second syntax, intersect returns a list of all elements in list-A that are also in list-B, without eliminating duplicates in list-A But, then, intersect function is not doing an intersection (on the other ha...
- Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:38 am
- Forum: newLISP in the real world
- Topic: Intersect bug
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6253
Intersect bug
Hi, if there's a dedicated bug tracker for newLISP please let me know and I'll repost it there. There's a bug in intersect function: $ newlisp newLISP v.10.5.4 64-bit on OSX IPv4/6 UTF-8, options: newlisp -h > (set 'a '(2 2)) (2 2) > (set 'b '(2 2 2)) (2 2 2) > (intersect a b true) (2 2) > (intersec...