newlispfanclub.alh.net

Why not use /Applications/Utilities/Terminal.app ?

Am I missing something?

That's fine and all, but how does one handle files that are loaded via (load)? How do those file determine where they are?

Does anyone know how I can get the cwd of the file being executed, or a way to get the cwd of any given process? My problem is that realpath shows the working directory from where newlisp was started. Example: $ pwd /home/statik/ $ cat code/test.lsp (println (real-path)) (exit) $ newlisp code/test.l...

I didn't realize you had implemented realpath into the latest dev... I'll check it out. Thanks.

Any idea when (cwd) is gonna make into newlisp? Next release? Release after that? Eventually?

Also, PWD is an environtment variable, and you can clearly see that by doing the following at the command line:
Is there a reason why (env) does not utilize ALL available environment variables?

I read a few older threads here and while newlisp + fcgi was mentioned as being used or toyed with, I never could find anything that hinted at it's success... If someone here has successfully gotten newlisp to work with fastcgi (and lighttpd would be nice too) please let me know how you managed to d...

Proof that people will find anything and everything to complain about.

I am wondering what the easiest, or most efficient way is to search a string for all occurances of X and populating a list with each occurance. I've come up with a few solutions to this, but I am not sure that they are as fast or easy as they could be. I'd like to do a (find) with some regex on a st...

Yes, you were correct in assuming a typo. Thanks for the help, that clarifies a lot for me.

That is so awesome :-)

What would you suggest I mold into a habit? Using a context prefix: (context 'MYCONTEXT) (define (myfunc , ) (println MAIN:a) ) (context 'MAIN) (setq a 10) (MYCONTEXT:myfunc) or passing the value of a symbol when calling a function from another context: (context 'MYCONTEXT) (define (myfunc value , )...

Is there a work around, or can we impliment a change? Does it work this way for a reason?

Can anyone tell me why the following is true: (setq a 1) (setq b 2) (setq c 3) (setq d 1) (case d (a (do-this)) (b (do-that)) (c (do-something)) (true) ) => nil I understand that the comparative values in my case are unevaluated. When switched out for an (eval) the case still doesn't work. (setq a 1...

Nah, I actually did this on OBSD. But regardless, your solution was perfect. Thanks :)

I can do the following in perl:
And as you can see the \xca result is the Ê character. If I wanted to duplicate this very thing in newlisp, how would I do it?

What an embarassment haha. Well I think I tracked down the flaw/bug...
I forgot to repack the data before sending it back. That would do it.

Thanks you guys for the help.

#!/usr/bin/newlisp (context 'MAIN) (setq host "69.55.233.82") (setq port 5842) (setq socket (net-connect host port)) (if socket (begin (println "Connected successfully!") (print "Receiving data: ") (setq final "") (while (and (net-select socket "r" 1000000) (> (net-peek socket) 0)) (net-receive soc...

Thank you sir.

Yes, I'm almost positive that I'm looking at four 32 bit integers :-) I'm pretty surprised I haven't seen pack/unpack used before. I have no idea how I've missed it for so long.

Once again, thanks.

I have an unsigned integer that is four bytes long that is sent to me via a network connection. When the server sends the integer, newlisp sees it as various characters ()&!@#*)}{":>?^`á–ó<Š¤,Ù¸í.!ƒ/,á–ó< so on and so forth. What I need to do is take those four bytes and 'convert' them into an integ...

Is there no way to force net-receive to wait until the entire space of 'buffer has been filled?

I'm confused as to why the following occurs: netcat (nc): # nc server 5842 %œŽ00ü›nßæ"ûO-^[[?1;2c telnet: # telnet server 5842 Connected to server. Escape character is '^]'. .m’Ww¢½MºÏŸjù©3 Now as you can see here, the content that is received is always different upon every connection. I could use ...

If I am not mistaken, you want to search that list of numbers, collecting a group, and forming them into various different equations until you've discovered a valid formula that evaluates to your chosen number. Am I right in my assumptions?

I am not entirely sure that either of us had put a whole lot of detailed thought into the idea, however, I know that in my experience, documentation done with wiki software has only been a good thing. You'll notice that a lot of opensource projects are moving that way, and for good reason.

I second that notion.